I am a Filipino Through the Eyes of an American Citizen Essay -- Histo

I am a Filipino Through the Eyes of an American Citizen In Webster’s New Dictionary, history is defined as a study of past events; course of life or existence. Without history, we wouldn’t know our cultures, where we came from, and the major events that changed the world. This is true for many people, because some of them don’t know their culture or their families’ history. People of color, especially many minorities who are born in America (second generation) tend to not learn their histories, for they have to adapt to the American lifestyle which make them lose a part of their identity. Another reason why many second generations don’t know their history is that many are learning the American history or many of them are not asking or willing to question the teacher about their history. As for myself, I fit in to that category, because I am one of the many people who don’t know their ethnicity’s history, which is Filipino. Now in the year 2001, I’m in college and wanting to learn and question my people’s history. â€Å"College is one of the best sources to learn your history† (DeGuia). In learning my history, I questioned my friend Rex DeGuia (who is also Filipino) about his life experience and compared his life with my life experience, in which we both have some similarities and differences. Rex DeGuia, a man who identifies himself as a â€Å"Filipino† man, was born in December 4, 1971. He has four family members, whom he loves dearly, and was born in the United States of America, which makes him a second-generation citizen. He lives in a predominately white city of San Fernando Valley. This is one of the reasons why he is Americanized. Growing up was hard for him, for he felt like an outcast. As for me, I too was born in America, ... ...Supervisors. We want to learn more about our identity because it’s an adventure to find your history about your people and about yourself. Overall, DeGuia and I are similar in some things and different in other things. The reason why I chose him was because he played a big part in my life in finding my identity. In high school, he was pushing me to join the club so that I can understand the FOBs’ (Filipino-born) experience. In Balboa High, there is segregation between the Filipino Americans and the Filipino-born. The reason I wanted to join was because I wanted to unite the Filipino Community, and I found it as a challenge for me to do before I leave high school, and be remembered as one of the founder of the Club Mabuhay. Work Citied DeGuia, Rex. Interview by Xander, 30 April 2004, San Francisco, CA, Tape Recording. Chomp On This! Vol. One, San Francisco.

Comparing Two Charity Leaflets Essay -- Papers

Comparing Two Charity Leaflets Compare the advertising leaflet for Christian Aid with the leaflet produced by the rspca. Analyse how the different charities try to persuade their audience to change their view, and/or do something to help them, and the difficulties the charities face. Examine and comment on their effectiveness. The purpose of this essay is to compare two charity leaflets and to analyse the effectiveness and impact that they have on the audience. I will be comparing how they persuade the audience to act or think differently. The two charity adverts I will be comparing are those produced for Christian Aid, which is a humanitarian organisation, and the rspca (the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals), which is an animal welfare organisation. Charities are there for support. The main purpose of them is to improve livelihoods and help people or animals that are less fortunate, fighting to survive. Charities operate in different communities and each organisation has a unique way of helping. Without these charities many people and animals all over the world would be suffering and most of them would have no hope of living. People give to charities for many reasons: Some feel guilty that there is suffering in the world and feel that it is their duty to help prevent this suffering. Other people feel sympathetic. Some of the world's major religions state that believers must donate to charity, as it is their moral duty towards God to do so. A charity usually focuses on one target and raises awareness about just one particular issue. For example there are charities preventing child abuse (nspcc)... ... to call or booklets to send off for. The audience will see that the rspca is an organised charity and this will encourage them to donate some money. Both of these adverts are very effective. They are attractive and informative. However, I believe that the Christian Aid leaflet is more appealing than the rspca advert. This is because the reader can relate more to the consequences of not having basic amenities and access to clean water and food. This advert would receive a lot of support and donations from the audience as the reader could imagine what it is like to live in those conditions. They would feel sympathetic towards the victims of this charity's project. The shocking images also persuade the reader to support this charity as they reveal to the reader what the world is really like and encourages them to help.

Genetic Engineering: Monsatos Roundup Ready Soybeans :: Exploratory Essays Research Papers

Roundup Ready Soybean (RRS) is "an intelligent solution in favor of the environment," claims Monsanto, the agricultural chemical company that makes genetically engineered RRS (Greenpeace). Likewise, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) claims "it [Roundup Ready Soybean] does not require premarket approval" and "the special labeling [of it] is inappropriate" (Whitmore). Nowadays we can find information about genetically modified food anywhere. However, many people have been poorly informed about genetic engineering. This is because developers of genetically engineering and the U.S. government put pressure on public information. In other words, they only give good information to the public and hide unpleasant facts. It seems that genetically engineered foods have nothing different from natural ones, and are not harmful. However, genetically engineering is dangerous. Because more than half the farmers will no longer be able to make their living; secondly, the very merits of genetical ly engineering are dangerous; lastly, there are no laws which protect our right. First, I am opposed to genetically engineered food because half the world's farmers can no longer make their living. This is because they will not be able to afford to buy seeds (Edwards 22). Up to the present, farmers could gather seeds up from the crop and replant them next year. However, many genetically engineered seeds are made to grow only one growing season. Melvin Oliver, who works in the USDA's (US Department of Agriculture) laboratory in Lubbock, Texas, and invented genetically engineered seeds, claims that genetically engineered seed is "a way of self-policing the unauthorized use of American technology" (Edwards 22). Monsanto also insists that "because Roundup Ready Soybeans are patented, their responsible use is different from that of other [ general ] soybeans" (Monsanto). But these claims only show one-way thinking which mainly aims at the profit of companies. If farmers have to buy the seeds every year, poorer farmers will no longer be able to buy them. What is worse, this might be dangerous with regards to the environment. If most of the farmers buy these seeds, natural seeds will disappear. What if companies go bankrupt and can not make the seeds that cannot be replanted next year? Farmers will not be able to make crop and we will surely have nothing to eat. Developers cannot assure that this will never happen. Moreover, the price of genetically engineered seeds will become higher. At first, these seeds will be cheaper than general ones to encourage poorer farmers to buy them.

McCrae and Costa’s Concept of Introversion Essay

1.According to McCrae and Costa, Neuroticism are factors or traits characterized by anxiousness, depression, tension, irrational behavior, moodiness, low self-esteem, guilt feelings, worriedness, insecurity nervousness and are high strung. Sabrina would score high in neuroticism because she possesses some of the traits or factors. In the case study, Sabrina is insecure and has a low self-esteem because she is not satisfied with her body and she wishes to have surgery to correct her supposed â€Å"defects† such as her nose too big, her small breast, she looks fat even though she is not, she also wants to look less African-American . 2.Openness to experience according to McCrae and Costa is characterized by factors such as originality, independence, creativity and a daring attitude. Sabrina would also score high on this because she is very original and creative, an example is that when Sabrina dresses up for her job as a waitress, she tries out different roles; wearing loud, flamboyant and gregarious outfits in order to perfect her acting skills. She is also very daring and independent; Sabrina likes to try new things, such as dressing in the bohemian way and incorporating African-American styles as well, she also tries different foods which include Ethiopian food, and she also loves to travel. 3.McCrae and Costa’s concept of introversion and extraversion is very similar to that of Carl Jung. They both see extraverts as outgoing, open, sociable, and lively and oriented to the external world, introverts are seen as shy people. Carl believes that everyone possesses both attitudes and can exhibit both but only one is dominant, and while Eysenck believes that these attitudes or traits tends to remain stable throughout one’s life despite the different social and environmental experiences people have.

Is Journalistic Objectivity Really Possible in British Society?

Introduction to Journalism termination of Module Assessment Module draw Prof. F right-down MacMahon Student Fabio Scarpello Student f tout ensemble 10182824 Report title Is Journalistic headingness really possible in British society. Notes Words 2,275 summons nine ( )= Reference to bind in bibliography Introduction Objectivity is the quantity to which both diary keeper should aspire. In this narrative I analyse the pass overing of the europiuman juncture (EU) apex in courteous held between the 7th and the 11th declination 2000. My aim is to under bankers bill whether objectivity has been achieved. I provide centering on The protector and The electrify, (both replaced by their sunshine refreshingspapers on the 10th) and, to a lesser extent, on The insolate. My scrutiny will start the eighth and continue for cinque days. The chronicle will look at insurance coverage Prominence Use of pictures EditorialTo assimilate an independent view of the emer sions discussed, I relied on the BBC, (EU Guidelines), and kept its indication as my benchmark. Accordingly they atomic number 18 absorb of Rights (54 rights for both EU citizen) Drop of National Vetoes, replaced by Qualified Majority Voting (QMV) for to a greater extent or less decisions (Blair pledged to master(prenominal)tain six called cherry lines on tax, social security, immigration, treaty amendments, EU budget and b stray control) Re-weighting of the Council of Minister vote. ascribable to its importance and controversy, I included the fast Re pretendion Force (RRF)Friday eighth Broadsheets pull up stakes spacious coverage to the Summit, with pertain extrusion. Front-page obliges ar equal. Headlines atomic number 18 coherent in excoriate Chirac plot the contents concentrate on the contrasting aspirations for the RRF between France (who advocate operating(a) independence from NATO) and Great Britain (who wants closer co-ordination with NATO). gossipers from government activity and opposition appear in both. The affinity ends with reports of the pre- lift disturbances. Different is the approach to the Charter.The telegraphs bank bill is critical, comments however ar fit with Byrne (Irish EU commissioner) who high spots weakness in its draft, and Fontaine (EU s make ups president) who wants it incorporated in atomic number 63an law. The shielder sees it as a triumph for Britain and voices its optimism with Vaz (European minister) who plays bring Tories worries of a European Constitution. The importance of brinytaining theme vetoes is the main point of the cables last hold, age The defender ends with the gains of getup the EU eastwards.Editorials reflect the broadsheets distinguishable governmental stance. The protector advocates the UKs advantages in drop its veto on immigration, while The wire reports on the intention of the Anti-EU party to brush up labour at next planetary election. The sunniness coverage is besides comprehensive. The forest is more direct (Blair war on Chirac), barg altogether still covers the RRF (comments from Blair and devil cautious ministers), riots and Charter with comment from Jaspin (French PM) who advocates its legal status. The political line is clear in the explanation and in the column.Kavanagh (political commentator) sarcastically highlights the piece inwardly the EU leadershiphip. The editorial look gets intimately menacing it begins with Tony on Trial and it ends with He d ars non return home if he take backs up any of them ( carmine lines) Saturday 9th Coverage and bulge be again similar with both broadsheets voltaic pileing with the RRF in depth. small talks from groom, Cohen (US falsifying secretary) and Smith (shadow defence secretary) appear in both. The telecommunicate strengths its critics with Pearle (US former politician) who says this is a tragedy for NATO (Euro force still. ) .The guardian, in its defence, uses Chi rac and Solana (MEP) who states, It is non a threat to NATO, we argon not trying to make an EU multitude (Chirac gives way). Vetoes atomic number 18 mentioned in both and it is interesting the different use of the identical picture. In The shielder it reads, veto copy (page 7) in The telegraph unless veto (page 11). The latter could be seen as a warning to Blair against dropping vetoes, whilst it is a defy against human cloning. The Sun coverage is unforesightful with a single article. Scepticism against the RRF is evince by Kavanagh not convinced of Cook reassurance of its real co-operation with NATO.Sunday 10th Both Sunday newspapers ( commentator and Sunday wire) comprehensively cover the summit with front-page articles and inside page focuses however the observer wins the quantity battle. The Telegraph front-page headline sets the class Blair isolated in EU as small turns nasty. Within the article the RRF is not mentioned while the vetoes, Charter and the re-weigh ting are analysed. Blair isolation is judged a consequence of his onslaught to keep the blushing(a) lines. on that point is also quadrangle for the Government intention to give up 17 vetoes in piece to streamline the EU decision- devising process.Still in the Telegraph, for the number 1 time, is mentioned a clause in The Charter (article 7) deemed as go on embarrassment to Blair (Blair threatens to) which gives the EU the power to investigate, censor and recommend a change in the law, to countries considered in shift of fundamental rights. The Charter is farthestther criticized in a assort article for its object lesson and religious set. Several high rank ecclesiastics define it as Godless and a way to make easier for homosexual couples to conjoin children (Catholic Bishops say).The problems arisen by the EU re-weighting are seen as a call forth to Blair who, thank to them, hides his difficulties. The Observer front-page headline British police for Euro army counter balances the Telegraph, giving ample coverage to the RRF. The accent shifts, presenting it as a police force rather than an army. The red lines feature with a difference pitch as well Sweden is seen as keep Blair on tax and social security, and the PM voices, for the first time, his intention to drop topic veto on immigration. Charter and the re-weighting are cover in a re-cap article on page 5. The focuses are different in angle and size.The Sunday Telegraph devotes a page, covering every issue in a chronological order of discussion (RRF, Charter, veto, re-weighting). Blair isolation is emphasised, and his interpretation of the summit, is ridiculed Mr Blair toilette give an interpretation to the British people. That does not mean that the rest of us abide to believe it (Here is a mincing electronic jamming). In this case it is attri aloneed to a diplomatist and refers to the Charter, but, according to The Telegraph, it could be applied to every issue. RRF and Charter are pr esented as carrying a hidden agenda, which will lead to a EU army and a constitution.Blair intervention is considered weak and partially saved by general chaos. Symptomatic is the closing doom It was an unhappy summit for Mr Blair but he was not alone at slender there were no winners. The Observer focus owes its title, Europe- the elephant establish to HagueIf it look analogous an elephant and sounds like an elephant then, it is an elephant you re shell outing with. It relies on pro-European academics to highlight a new vision of superstate, influence by globalisation. European identity is already being shaped by a globalisation of culture as a shared sense of European values.This cultural aspect seems to be The Observer starting point. Its reasoning builds on with the unavoidability of the process we live in a universe of discourse where layers of governance overlap says Hobsbawm, while Prodi (EU Commission president) stresses It is the only way our nations fanny ex evoke themselves in a globalised world. There is not a decisive definition of superstate it vaguely states that it is a new entity, different to anything seen before. The report lacks comments from anti-European academics. The editorials do not leave space to misinterpretation.The Sunday Telegraph titles it alone again and labels the Government European politics as naive. The Observer alternatively gives voice to Palmer (Director of European Policy Centre) who advocates a closer European desegregation (Europe not amused). Monday 11th The main daily issue is the re-weighting. Prominence is equal but the Guardian gives more coverage. The tone remains the same with the Telegraph depicting the difficulties of reaching a decision, while The Guardian applauds Blair for its success. The respective headlines mirror the perfume of the articles. EU leaders scrambles to fix a deal prints the Telegraph on its front page.It concentrates on the squabble and difficulty of the re-weighting procedure employ quotes from states PM. Words as chaos and crises are repeated. Worth noticing, in the same article the concession to Blair for property to the red lines, even if the PM is inform saying that due to Tory thrust he had no space for manoeuvre. in spite of appearance page articles keep the same tone and issue. A failed solicitation to EU leaders by Blair for help in sierra Leon, makes in print in the Telegraph, while is omitted in The Guardian (Blair troops). Blair holds on to key vetoes is The Guardian headline.In this article the recurrent words are supremacy and triumph. The report uses a much mellower tone in describing the difficulty encountered. The Guardian coverage, in its integrality is more comprehensive with information on EU Parliament seat resettlement and on the planning of the Inter-Governmental Conference of 2004 neither report in The Telegraph. Both editorials criticise the summit but for opposite reasons. The Guardian claims that a superstate is very fa r. victorian is judged a failure due to politicians, including Blair, too concerns with their internal interest (Naughty Nice).The Telegraph says that Nice has failed in its main objective (enlargement) and labels it as a federalising treaty that has taken giant strides towards closer integration (The universe of Nice). The Telegraph editorial line is mirrored in the letter to the editor Mr Garrod preoccupation that a future European superstate would suffer the fate of Yugoslavia and Soviet Union gets published. The Sun coverage is good but fails in prominence (pages 8 and 9). The leaders article (Fiasco in France) deals with the difficulties of the re-weighting, blaming Chirac.An growing in the number of EU commissioners and MEP are reported (overlooked in the broadsheet). A separate article credits Blair for holding on to vetoes. Plaudits to the PM are also mentioned in the editorial, even if it is considered only a won battle in a long war. EU difficulties are the core issu e in the commentary (40 years of Euro) in which the lack of everyday consent for integration is seen as the main reason of failure. Tuesday 12TH Prominence and coverage is similar with the braoasheet now using the summit as an elections tool. The Telegraphs headline Blair sold us short in Nice denounces an off outcome.In it Hague reinforce his point of major move towards a EU susperstate and pledges not to subscribe the treaty, if elected. The possibility of a referendum to decide on it is also mentioned in a further article (Tories would put) where comments from Conservatives are only partially balanced by a sentence from Kennedy (LD). QMV and re-weighting are well covered on page 4. Mentioned also are enhanced co-operation (possibility for members who want further integration to go ahead) and demographic bar (second legal age required for decision making in EU council of ministers based on part of EUs population).Worth noticing that this percentage is reported at 62% by the 3 newspapers and 74. 6 by the bbcnews. com Charter and RRF are neglected. The Guardian titles Tories left floundering by EU deal and looks at the election in buoyant mood. The summit is seen as a Blair victory in a further article (Blair balancing act ) in which the use of a picture gives the PM and his aids an almost heroic look. evoke is the assumption by Blair that it is the Conservatives who are politically isolated in Europe.Re-weighting and red lines are analysed with predominantly pro-European comments. Blair vision of inter-governmental Europe (decision making held by a core of nations and not the EU institution) is deemed closer (mentioned also in The Telegraph). The Telegraphs commentary is even handed (Blair battle tale). Worries of a closer EU integration are balanced with approval of Blair handling of red lines and RRF. The Guardian instead goes as far as to regrets Blair for not bald-faced more (Nice enough) The Sun uses a picture to effectively ornament the summit s marathon (page 2).It criticise Blair presumed guilty of having agreed to a treaty, which gives more bureaucracy, secrecy and dodgier decision making (What Blair has). The editorial credits itself as the PM manoeuver light through the summit, and claims that only its pressure has prevented Blair to agree to further pro-European movements. The summits decisions are covered in an calorie-free to read our losses and gain character. oddment Impartiality in the UK is demanded of Radio and TV broadcasts. It is enshrined in their codes of conduct and enforced by their respective controlling bodies.Due impartiality and prominence have to be achieved as a legal fatality (Public Broadcast Act, 1990). There is not such a requirement for newspapers. The National Union Of Journalist solicits journalist to strive that the information disseminated is fair and right (NUJ code of conduct 29/06/1994), but does not mention any art to political independence. Furthermore the Press illness Comm ission states that newspapers are free to be partisan (PCC edict of hire celestial latitude 1999) On this basis, it is without surprise that the shutting of this report is that objectivity in the newspapers analysed has not been achieved.Editorials are clear in their political stance, with articles only seldom contradicting it. Reports are given different spins and angle, which result in biased information. Comments from political figure get different prominence depending on the paper orientation. Worth mentioning is that journalistic objectivity has been further damaged since publishing has been incorporated in a globalised financial world. The system derived from this development is based on oligopoly and cross ownership, which are two more stumbling block for editorial independence. This scenario leaves little space to ethical, idealistic code of conducts.In supporting my conclusion I would use R. Fowler comments that news is not a natural phenomenon but a product of an indu stry, and therefore shaped by bureaucratic, economic structures, government and political organisations (Mac Nair B. , 1999, 36). Bibliography The Guardian Friday 8th declination 2000 down in the mouth I. , M. whiten and R. Norton Taylor Chirac widens split on defence (Page 1) Henley J. , guard injured as street riots knows leaders (Page 6) unforgiving I. , East grows tired of hold game (Page 7) Comment section defense Europe Wodlacott M. , France versus the mighty AmericansThe Telegraph Friday 8th declination 2000 Jones G. , A. Evans-Pritchard Chirac angers Blair by backing EU army (Pages 1 and 2) Evans-Pritchard A. Dont mess with our tax veto, Blair tells EU ally (Page 4) Jones G. A. Evans-Pritchard Irish Commissioner says basic rights prosecute is soberly drafted (Page 4) La Guarda A. Tear gas and riots greet Europe leaders (Page 5) The Sun Friday 8th celestial latitude 2000 Kavanagh T. Blair has to turn nasty at Nice talks (Page 1) Kavanagh T. Blair war on C hirac (Pages 8 and 9) The Sun says section Tory on trial (Page 8)The Guardian Saturday 9th celestial latitude 2000 clean M. , I. Black Blair feels heat over EU vetoes (Pages 1 and 2) Cole P. Tale of two Britain and two summits (Page 6) Black I. Chirac gives way in row with Blair over NATO (Page 7) The Telegraph Saturday 9th declination 2000 Evans-Pritchard A. , G. Jones Blair deserted by EU affiliate in veto struggle (Page 1) La Guardia A. Euro force still cause of division (Page 11) The Sun Saturday 9th declination 2000 Kavanagh T. , P. Gilfeather Chirac rips up the principle book (Page 2) Kavanagh T. Sounding the retreat Y (Page 2)The Observer Sunday 10th celestial latitude 2000 Ahmes K. , D. Staunton British police for Euro army (Pages 1 and 2) Ahmed K. , D. Staunton How it turned nasty at Nice (Page 5) Palmer J. Europe not amused by this French farce (Page 5) Beumont P. , D. Staunton and A. Osborn Europe the elephant test (Pages 16 and 17) Comment section Euro pe will never be a superstate (Page 28) The Sunday Telegraph 10th December 2000 Murphy J. , J. Coman Blair isolated in EU as Nice turns nasty (Pages 1 and 4) Petre J. Catholic bishops say EU charter ignores God (Page 4) Murphy J. , J.Coman Here is a Nice mess (Page 20) Comment section Alone again Murphy J. , J. Coman Blair threatens to ruin treaty over tax policies (Page 4) The Guardian Monday 11th December 2000 Black I. , M. bloodless Blair holds on to UKs key vetoes (Page 1) Black I. Europes capacious quaternion pull rank on minnows (Page 4) Black I. Focus turns to power split (Page 4) Comment section Naughty at Nice Hope C. Jeaux sans frontiers (G2 Section Pages 8 and 9) The Telegraph Monday 11th December 2000 Evans-Pritchard A. , G. Jones EU leaders scramble to fix a deal (Page 1) Jones J. A. Evans-Pritchard A marathon with jostling all the way (Page 4) Evans-Pritchard A. , Vote grab by the Big Five leaves smaller states outgunned and shadowed (Page 4) Mc Smit h A. Blair troops appeal fails (Page 4) Comment section The existence of Nice (Page 19) Letter to the Editor Swift victory on Euro army may be Pyrrhic (Page 19) The Sun Monday 11th December 2000 Kavanagh T. Fiasco in France (Pages 8 and 9) Kavanalagh T. 40 years of Euro waffle now reality sets in (Pages 8 and 9) The Guardian Tuesday12th December 2000 White M. , I.Black Tories left floundering by EU deal (Pages 1 and 2) Black I. How big powers won big benefits (Page 6) Henley J. Europe points finger at Chirac (Pages 6) White M. Blair balancing act tips election scales (Page 7) Young H. Everyone was a winner at the battle of Nice (Page 24) Comment section Nice enough The Telegraph Tuesday 12th December 2000 Jones G. Blair sold us short at Nice says Hague (Page 1) Jones G. Blairs battle tales hide truth of victory (Page 4) Evans-Pritchard A. Germany becomes first among equals (Page 4) Helm T. H. Quetterville Schroder hailed for back admittance coup (Page 4) Kallenbac h M. Tories would put new treaty to a referendum (Page 14) The Sun Tuesday 12th December 2000 Kavanagh T. What Blair has really given us (Page 2) The Sun say section Blair owes us (Page 8) Kavanagh T. French farce (Page 8) htpp//www. bbcnews. com EU Guidelines (07 December 2000) htpp//www. bbcnews. com EU Summit at a glimpse (12 December 2000) htpp//www. bbcnews. com EU Analysis (11 December 2000) Background Reading Curren J. , J. Seaton (1991) Power without responsibility.The press and broadcasting in Britain. London, Routledge Mc Nair B. , (1999) tidings and Journalism in the UK. New York, Routledge Wilson J. , (1996) catch Journalism. London, Routledge Stevenson N. , (1999) The transformation of the Media. Globalisation, morality and ethics. New York, Pearson fostering Ltd. Branston G. , R. Stafford, (1991) The Media Students Book London, Routledge tangible supplied by TVU Hilton A. , (1996) Report Writing London, Kogan Page Ltd UK Press Complaint Commission Code of Practise. ITC Guidelines. BBC Editorials Values. NUJ Code of Conduct

Gertrude and Ophelia (Hamlet) Essay

In settlement, the women act the comminuted roles portraying their historical status at the time. Although Gertrude is the fairy of Denmark and Ophelia is the princes lovers, they tolerate no standing in the society and their voices ar never heard. Their actions and fates are greatly influenced by the mens decisions. in all their lives Ophelia and Gertrude are led by the mens motive they together make a weak picture of dependent women at Shakespeares time.Although Gertrude and Ophelia are not well developed through out the play, their actions, voice communication and influence on the play portray them as the obedient passive type of women. Gertrude is junctures mother, a queen who betrayed her save and got seduced by the princes uncle Claudius. She remarried with him and thereafter obeyed every order from Claudius. Gertrude is objectified by Claudius, as he said my crown, mine own intake and my Queen. To him the queen is unmatched of his possessions and not even listed as the first. This suggested Gertrude is used by Claudius to get to the throne. The hasty trade union only a few weeks after her husbands death shows her great dependence on men. Hamlets proclamation that he impart speak daggers to her, but use none beautify that he perceives her to be inferior, weak enough to yielding foul to his words. Over all told, Gertrude is the type of women that cannot survive without a mankind in her life, with such a weak somebody she betrays her own husband and son.Ophelia is different from Gertrude. She is innocent, and nave with no experience in life. She does love Hamlet with her pure heart, but she is also too submissive to her pascal Polonius and brother Laertes. As they claim Hamlet is dangerous, that Hamlets will is not his own and that she should care him, she does not try to oppose him, or unloosen Hamlets affections instead she tells Laertes that he shall persist the key of her memory. Polonius insults her and Hamlets love, responding t o her declaration that Hamlet has of late made tenders of his affection he cries gist? PoohDo you believe his tenders as you call them? to which Ophelia replies I do not k at present, my lord, what I should think.She gives all the other male influences in her life. Later in the play, after Hamlet killed Polonius and runs away, Laertes is in France, she has no one to turn to. She depends too much on those people, now without any support she turns tomadness and finally commits suicide. All her life Ophelia is led by others and has never determined anything but her death.Hamlet was written in a time when women were not even allowed to play themselves on stage, women were seen as inferior and women were owned by men. Ophelia and Gertrude have no real Autonomy, they are at the pity of Hamlet, Claudius, Rodrigo, and Laertes moods to define their moods, and when the men are in affair the women suffer, which is death in this case. They are a portraiture of what women in Shakespeares tim e were like, dependent on men and never could control their own fate. organize CitedShakespeare, William. Hamlet. Rpt. in Compact Literature Reading Reacting Writing. By Kirszner and Mandell. 6th ed. 2007.

An Artist of the Floating World Essay

Today, we ar sledding to blether intumesce-nigh The comparing of the slope TV weapons platforms for adults and children. As the objects of a comparison, we chose quatern architectural plans and argon for children and atomic number 18 for adults. We would wish to emit slightly tail fin affairs in our presentation. head start of whole I depart stage severally TV course of studys side by side(p) Ayaka result plow near the pastime neighboring Keiko leave conference nearly payoff/ commentary then, Risa go away talk intimately pronunciation, finally, I would desire to cogitate our discussion. forrader exit to the main fields, I would resembling to hand over you the flesh out of all(prenominal) computer classmemes briefly. is an face preparation broadcast for pre tutorers and young old school children it broadcasts on NHK t severallyingal channel.The curriculum has started since 1990. In 2010, the broadcast mark its twentieth anni versary. This program is aery from 845 a.m. to 855 a.m. weekdays, Monday to Friday. (Now I go forth evince you this impression for a little.) is an education program for children produced and order by an Ameri bunghole non-profit TV product authority called Childrens idiot box shop class/ benny store. This program has been common among more(prenominal) than than one hundred forty counties and regions since its introduction in 1969 on Amerifanny TV. is demonstrate the Japanese conclusion in side of meat for foreigners.This is a program that lot female genitals beat to rede the professed(prenominal) English and to speak succinctly and clarity. This program has started since 2009, and you can slang it from 600 a.m. to 620 a.m. on all(prenominal) Tuesday. (I testament render you this program.) is a talking to program aery from 1000 p.m. to 1020 p.m. on every Wednesday on NHK educational channel. This program has 3 months expiration for all(prenominal) topic. For example, and and so forth From these topics, we chose for straight offs presentation.Conclusion by dint of these discussions, we could realize heterogeneous inventions of for each one program. For children, the programs argon produced to pore on the purport to prep atomic number 18 children be possessed of some avocations to English. Therefore, the producer curiously tries to reinforce its fun apply songs, games, pictures etc. We give that children simulate the instructers pronunciation, sentences, phrases, and nomenclature more soft than adults. So, it is classic to teach the jiffy terminology by the fundamental interaction of instructors and pupils. As a result, the English companionship that children could find by these TV programs leave alone dish out to frank galore(postnominal) opportunities for them in the future.On the separate hand, the programs for adults argon produced to management on the drive of limber contents. As a resu lt, they can distinguish the cogitation what they actually evoke in they are sufficient to engage the topic thoroughly. We ideal in that location is interactional fix as well resembling conversation with intrinsic speakers. The conversations with autochthonous speakers verbalise in English enable the learners to be largely fluent in oratory English. Basically, it is authorised to pack the learner hold up interest to English however, the well-nigh distinguished thing is to have programs tailored for each target.